Skip to content

Add mesh conformance tests for httproute path host and status redirect #3777

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

LiorLieberman
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?
/area conformance-test

Add mesh tests for port and scheme redirect
This is a follow up to #3729

What this PR does / why we need it:
Add mesh tests coverage

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Related #3581

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Add mesh conformance tests for httproute path host and status redirect

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. area/conformance-test Issues or PRs related to Conformance tests. labels May 1, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from robscott and Xunzhuo May 1, 2025 22:11
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 1, 2025
@LiorLieberman LiorLieberman force-pushed the httproute-mesh-tests-2 branch from 2309607 to 515fa33 Compare May 1, 2025 22:11
@LiorLieberman
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @kflynn

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from kflynn May 2, 2025 18:19
Copy link
Member

@robscott robscott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @LiorLieberman!

Comment on lines +53 to +58
// This option indicates mesh support for HTTPRoute scheme redirect (extended conformance)
SupportMeshHTTPRouteSchemeRedirect FeatureName = "MeshHTTPRouteSchemeRedirect"
// This option indicates mesh support for HTTPRoute port redirect (extended conformance)
SupportMeshHTTPRouteRedirectPort FeatureName = "MeshHTTPRouteRedirectPort"
// This option indicates mesh support for HTTPRoute path redirect (extended conformance)
SupportMeshHTTPRouteRedirectPath FeatureName = "MeshHTTPRouteRedirectPath"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can any of these features be considered core support for mesh?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤔 What does L7 functionality being core imply for Istio Ambient?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ambient mode will pass the conformance tests by deploying a waypoint for all the workloads (and already does this). It doesn't implement gateway API outside of waypoints (including TcpRoute)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So Istio is fine with core functionality requiring waypoints?

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: LiorLieberman, robscott

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 14, 2025
@kflynn
Copy link
Contributor

kflynn commented May 14, 2025

@LiorLieberman, thanks for sticking with this!

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 14, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit c698f24 into kubernetes-sigs:main May 14, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/conformance-test Issues or PRs related to Conformance tests. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants